Creating Trusted Operations Data Across a Mixed Energy Portfolio

An energy owner needed dependable operating information across assets with different systems and providers. Clarus Caelum managed the supplier end to end, from concept through delivery and handover to operations and maintenance, alongside the owner-side integration and acceptance work. The supplier delivered on time, to a high standard of quality and under budget. Common reporting, data-quality controls and clearer responsibilities improved the comparability of information across the portfolio.

Start with the owner's operating decisions

The portfolio's source data, control systems and provider arrangements did not automatically produce a consistent view. Similar conditions could be reported differently, while source quality and interface responsibilities were unclear.

We defined the users, decisions, information, timeliness and quality the owner needed. Sources, meanings, owners, transformations and destination uses were mapped so gaps could be addressed through the delivery work.

Manage the supplier from concept to operations

Clarus Caelum's mandate was to manage the supplier end to end, from concept through delivery and handover to operations and maintenance (O&M). Alongside that responsibility, Clarus Caelum coordinated the owner-side integration roadmap across disparate operational data and provider outputs, connecting business use, OT and SCADA interfaces, supplier delivery, data quality, assurance, acceptance and operational readiness.

We clarified scope boundaries, dependencies, acceptance evidence and support responsibilities across providers. Specialist suppliers retained responsibility for their work, with the owner-side coordination keeping their contributions aligned to the complete operating requirement.

Make reporting and acceptance consistent

Common reporting, alarm and event handling, data-quality controls and acceptance evidence were defined to support comparisons across assets. Integration, testing, readiness and support were sequenced in a practical roadmap.

The working package included the operating use cases and decisions, source and interface inventory, supplier responsibilities, quality and acceptance criteria, and the integration and delivery roadmap.

Delivery and operating outcome

The supplier delivered on time, to a high standard of quality and under budget. Common definitions and controls improved cross-site comparability. Clearer ownership and acceptance conditions reduced ambiguity at supplier interfaces. More consistent reporting, alarm and event handling, and data-quality practices improved the speed and dependability of operating decisions.

When this experience is relevant

This experience is relevant when information from similar assets cannot be compared without manual interpretation, suppliers own separate parts of a system but the owner needs the complete outcome managed, or data-quality problems appear only after operational use. It also applies when testing, acceptance and ongoing support responsibilities need to be agreed before handover.

Relevant service streams